Good Public Policy In Nagari: Solusi Untuk Permasalahan Sosial Ekonomi Masyarakat Berbasis Kebijakan Deliberatif Di Nagari Binjai Tapan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47134/villages.v5i1.82Keywords:
kebijakan publik, deliberatif, NagariAbstract
Artikel ini mendeskripsikan penerapan good public policy di Nagari Binjai Tapan Kabupaten Pesisir Selatan untuk menjadi solusi bagi permasalahan sosial kemasyarakatan dengan menggunakan konsep berbasis deliberatif. Tujuannya dari penerapan good public policy ini adalah untuk memperkuat kapasitas dan kelembagaan nagari baik sumber daya manusia, kelembagaan maupun sistem dan prosedur dalam memecahkan permasalahan yang ada di masyarakat sehingga dapat mencapai kesejahteraan sosial. Ada beberapa persoalan yang ditemukan untuk menerapkan good public policy ini yaitu: Pertama, kurangnya pengetahuan dan keterampilan pemerintah nagari dalam proses policy making dan legal drafting pada kebijakan/peraturan secara partisipatif. Kedua, kurangnya keterlibatan stakeholders di nagari untuk ikut menyumbangkan ide dan solusi dalam menyusun Peraturan Nagari. Dan ketiga, masih rendahnya tata kelola pemerintah nagari dalam proses perumusan dan implementasi kebijakan/peraturan di Tingkat Nagari. Sehingga dampak dari hal tersebut adalah belum tercapainya kesejahteraan sosial untuk mencegah, mengatasi dan/atau memberikan solusi terhadap pemecahan permasalahan sosial dan peningkatan kualitas hidup masyarakat. Berdasarkan temuan penelitian, ada tiga persoalan yang di hadapi oleh Nagari Binjai Tapan khususnya bidang sosial kemasyarakatan yaitu: pertama, persoalan ketenteraman dan ketertiban masyarakat, kedua, persoalan pemberdayaan kelompok usaha masyarakat dan ketiga kebersihan dan kelestarian lingkungan nagari. Sebagai solusi dari permasalahan tersebut diperlukan perancangan dan implementasi kebijakan pada level nagari yang berbasis deliberatif dengan melibatkan para pemangku kepentingan yang relevan. Tiga persoalan ini yang akan yang harus dilakukan secara deliberatif dalam merumuskan dan mengimplementasikan serta melakukan evaluasi terhadap kebijakan/peraturan nagari tersebut.
References
Bartels, K. P., Wagenaar, H., & Li, Y. (2020). Introduction: towards deliberative policy analysis 2.0. Policy studies, 41(4), 295-306.
Boossabong, P., & Chamchong, P. (2019). The practice of deliberative policy analysis in the context of political and cultural challenges: Lessons from Thailand. Policy studies, 40(5), 476-491.
Bua, A., & Escobar, O. (2018). Participatory-deliberative processes and public policy agendas: lessons for policy and practice. Policy Design and Practice, 1(2), 126-140.
Carson, L., & Hartz-Karp, J. (2005). Adapting and combining deliberative designs: Juries, polls, and forums. The deliberative democracy handbook: Strategies for effective civic engagement in the twenty-first century, 120-138.
Chambers, S. (2003). Deliberative democratic theory. Annual review of political science, 6(1), 307-326.
Escobar, O. (2017). Making it official: Participation professionals and the challenge of institutionalizing deliberative democracy. In The professionalization of public participation (pp. 141-164). Routledge.
Fischer, F. (2007). Deliberative policy analysis as practical reason: Integrating empirical and normative arguments. Handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics, and methods, 125, 223-226.
Fischer, F., & Boossabong, P. (2018). Deliberative policy analysis.
Fishkin, J. (2009). When the people speak: Deliberative democracy and public consultation. Oup Oxford.
Gastil, J., & Richards, R. (2013). Making direct democracy deliberative through random assemblies. Politics & Society, 41(2), 253-281.
Grindle, M. S. (Ed.). (1997). Getting good government: capacity building in the public sectors of developing countries. Harvard Univ Pr.
Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. F. (2009). Democracy and disagreement. Harvard University Press.
Hajer, M. A., & Wagenaar, H. (Eds.). (2003). Deliberative policy analysis: understanding governance in the network society. Cambridge University Press.
Ismail, M. H., & Sofwani, A. (2018). KONSEP DAN KAJIAN TEORI PERUMUSAN KEBIJAKAN PUBLIK. Jurnal Review Politik, 6(2), 195-224.
Khaidir, A., Alhadi, Z., Saputra, B.,. 2019. Pemberdayaan Secara Part isipat i f Dalam Program Penyusunan Produk Hukum di Nagari Manggopoh Kabupaten Agam. Open Society Conference Democracy and Public Accountability in Digital Era.
Kowarsch, M., Garard, J., Riousset, P., Lenzi, D., Dorsch, M. J., Knopf, B., ... & Edenhofer, O. (2016). Scientific assessments to facilitate deliberative policy learning. Palgrave Communications, 2(1), 1-20.
Mardiyanta, A. (2013). Restore public trust through deliberative public policy formulation. BISNIS & BIROKRASI: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan Organisasi, 20(1), 2.
Moleong, J. (2013). Lexy. 2007. Metodologi penelitian kualitatif.
Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Pesisir Selatan Nomor 2 Tahun 2016 tentang Nagari.
Peraturan Daerah Provinsi Sumatera Barat No. 7 Tahun 2018 Tentang Nagari.
Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri No. 111 Tahun 2014 tentang Pedoman Teknis Peraturan di Desa.
Ripley, R. B., & Franklin, G. A. (1986). Policy implementation and bureaucracy. Brooks/Cole.
Roberts, J., & Escobar, O. (2015). Involving communities in deliberation: A study of three citizens’ juries on onshore wind farms in Scotland. Edinburgh: ClimateXChange and The University of Edinburgh.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, kualitatif, kombinasi. Alvabeta.
Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2014 Tentang Desa.
Wagenaar, H. (2022). Deliberative policy analysis. In Research methods in deliberative democracy (pp. 423-437). Oxford University Press.
Wang, X., & Wan Wart, M. (2007). When public participation in administration leads to trust: An empirical assessment of managers’ perceptions. Public administration review, 67(2), 265-278.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Zikri Alhadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This journal is based on the work at https://villages.pubmedia.id/index.php/villages under license from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. You are free to:
- Share – copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
- Adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms, which include the following:
- Attribution. You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike. If you remix, transform or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions. You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Information for authors
The author should be aware that by submitting an article to this journal, the article's copyright will be fully transferred to Jurnal Administrasi Pemerintahan Desa. Authors are allowed to resend their manuscript to other journals or intentionally withdraw the manuscript only if both parties (Jurnal Administrasi Pemerintahan Desa and Authors) have agreed on the issue. Once the manuscript has been published, authors are allowed to use their published article under Jurnal Administrasi Pemerintahan Desa copyrights.
All authors are required to deliver the agreement of license transfer once they submit the manuscript to Jurnal Administrasi Pemerintahan Desa. By signing the agreement, the copyright is attributed to this journal to protect the intellectual material for the authors. Authors are allowed to share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium and in any circumstances.
• Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)
Jurnal Administrasi Pemerintahan Desa is licensed under an International License
