Algorithmic Authority and the Commodification of Religion: A Literature Review of the Shifting Islamic Broadcasting Ecosystem in the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Era

Authors

  • Suhaily Amri Hasibuan Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatra Utara
  • Hasan Sazali Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatra Utara
  • Muhammad Randicha Hamandia Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang
  • Zhila Jannati Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47134/villages.v7i2.523

Keywords:

Islamic Broadcasting, Artificial Intelligence, Algorithmic Authority, Religious Commodification, Post-Truth

Abstract

This study examines the transformation of Islamic Communication and Broadcasting in the era of Artificial Intelligence by focusing on algorithmic authority, religious commodification, and ethical crises in post-truth digital media. Using a qualitative library research design and critical discourse analysis, this article analyzes recent academic literature on AI-based da’wah, digital religion, platform capitalism, religious authority, and Islamic communication ethics. The findings show that AI and platform algorithms do not merely function as technical tools for producing and distributing religious content; they also act as curatorial powers that shape visibility, legitimacy, and public trust in Islamic messages. This transformation shifts religious authority from sanad-based scholarly transmission toward algorithmically amplified popularity, creating risks of misinformation, sensationalism, and weakened epistemic responsibility. The study also finds that Islamic broadcasting is increasingly absorbed into the logic of digital commodification, where religious symbols, sermon clips, and preacher branding are repackaged as attention-based commodities. In response, this article proposes a critical-paradigmatic reconstruction of Islamic Communication and Broadcasting through AI literacy, ethical platform governance, maqaṣid-oriented digital infrastructure, and social-impact-based evaluation. The success of digital da’wah should therefore be measured not only by virality and audience reach, but also by truthfulness, moderation, verification, social cohesion, and spiritual responsibility

References

A’yunin, T. Q., & Triastuti, E. (2022). Piety commodification of Niqabis in social media Instagram. EGALITA: Jurnal Kesetaraan dan Keadilan Gender, 17(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.18860/egalita.v17i2.17718

Abdulsalam, D. O., & Abdulrasheed, A. (2026). Digital distortion of religious preaching: An analysis of abuse of da’wah activities on social media. Suhuf: International Journal of Islamic Studies, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.23917/suhuf.v38i1.14129

Ahmmad, M., Shahzad, K., Iqbal, A., & Latif, M. (2025). Trap of social media algorithms: A systematic review of research on filter bubbles, echo chambers, and their impact on youth. Societies, 15(11), 301. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15110301

Aritonang, I., Barus, L. N. U. Br., & Rubino. (2026). Da’wah in the era of artificial intelligence: An ethical analysis of Islamic communication on the use of AI in the production of religious messages. Ath-Thariq: Jurnal Dakwah dan Komunikasi, 10(1). https://e-journal.metrouniv.ac.id/ath_thariq/article/view/12860

Aritonang, I., Barus, L. N. U. Br., & Rubino. (2026). Da’wah in the era of artificial intelligence: An ethical analysis of Islamic communication on the use of AI in the production of religious messages. Ath-Thariq: Jurnal Dakwah dan Komunikasi, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.32332/7tnc9m72

Dahal, N. (2025). Qualitative data analysis: Reflections, procedures, and some points for consideration. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 10, 1669578. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2025.1669578

Duffy, B. E., Pinch, A., Sannon, S., & Sawey, M. (2021). The nested precarities of creative labor on social media. Social Media + Society, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211021368

Elmahjub, E. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) in Islamic ethics: Towards pluralist ethical benchmarking for AI. Philosophy & Technology, 36, Article 73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00668-x

Firdaus, M. A., Syihabuddin, M., & Fuady, Z. (2025). Islam and artificial intelligence: Perspectives from traditionalist and modernist Muslim communities in Indonesia. MIQOT: Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Keislaman, 49(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.30821/miqot.v49i1.1333

Habib, Z. (2025). Ethics of artificial intelligence in Maqāṣid Al-Sharīa’s perspective. KARSA Journal of Social and Islamic Culture, 33(1), 105–134. https://ejournal.uinmadura.ac.id/index.php/karsa/article/view/19617

Hödl, T., Myrach, T., & Lutz, C. (2023). Content creators between platform control and user autonomy. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 65, 661–682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-023-00808-9

Jia, C., Lam, M. S., Mai, M. C., Hancock, J. T., & Bernstein, M. S. (2024). Embedding democratic values into social media AIs via societal objective functions. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 8(CSCW1), Article 163, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3641002

Karman, Hamad, I., & Rusadi, U. (2024). Commodification of instrumental Islamic piety in Indonesian political contestation 2019. Asian Journal of Communication, 34(3), 265–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2023.2295871

Kopf, S. (2025). Unravelling social media critical discourse studies (SM-CDS). Critical Discourse Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2025.2463622

Larsson, G., & Willander, E. (2025). Muslims and social media: A scoping review. Information, Communication & Society, 28(11), 1908–1922. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2024.2379835

Liang, Y., Li, J., Aroles, J., & Granter, E. (2025). Content creation within the algorithmic environment: A systematic review. Work, Employment and Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170251325784

Malik, F. A., & Hanapi, M. S. (2026). AI content fabrication and deception: An Islamic ethical and societal analysis. Planning Malaysia, 24(42). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v24i42.2041

Noguera-Vivo, J. M., & Grandío-Pérez, M. M. (2024). Enhancing algorithmic literacy: Experimental study on communication students’ awareness of algorithm-driven news. Anàlisi, 71. https://analisi.cat/article/view/v71-noguera-grandio

Park, S., & Nan, X. (2026). Generative AI and misinformation: A scoping review of the role of generative AI in the generation, detection, mitigation, and impact of misinformation. AI & Society, 41, 1501–1515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02620-3

Rachman, A., Saumantri, T., & Hidayatulloh, T. (2025). Transformation of religious authority in the digital era: A post-normal times analysis by Ziauddin Sardar on the phenomenon of social media da’wah. Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah, 45(1), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.21580/jid.v45.1.25644

Salhab, R. (2024). AI literacy across curriculum design: Investigating college instructors’ perspectives. Online Learning, 28(2), 22–47. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i2.4426

Syafuddin, K., & Wibowo, T. O. (2023). Commodification of religion-based audiovisual content on the YouTube channel: Case study on Islam Populer YouTube channel. SIBATIK Journal, 2(5), 1373–1382. https://doi.org/10.54443/sibatik.v2i5.745

Tarwiyyah, H. L. (2025). Artificial intelligence and bias in religious authority. Jurnal Informasi dan Teknologi, 7(2), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.60083/jidt.vi0.626

Ullah, M. A., Haque, M. S., & Islam, M. M. (2026). Artificial intelligence in Islamic communication: An ethical concern. Journal of Islamic Communication and Counseling, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.18196/jicc.v5i1.118

Downloads

Published

2026-06-16

How to Cite

Suhaily Amri Hasibuan, Hasan Sazali, Muhammad Randicha Hamandia, & Zhila Jannati. (2026). Algorithmic Authority and the Commodification of Religion: A Literature Review of the Shifting Islamic Broadcasting Ecosystem in the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Era. Jurnal Administrasi Pemerintahan Desa, 7(2), 8. https://doi.org/10.47134/villages.v7i2.523

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)