Perbandingan Reformasi Birokrasi dan Kinerja Pelayanan Publik di Indonesia dan Singapura

Authors

  • Erinaldi Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi Lancang Kuning Dumai
  • Rizka Fitri Aulia Lubis Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi Lancang Kuning Dumai
  • Grascyella Cintiya Marito Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi Lancang Kuning Dumai
  • Niken Larasati Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi Lancang Kuning Dumai
  • Dymas Aditya Putra Kaharuddin Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi Lancang Kuning Dumai

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47134/villages.v7i2.466

Keywords:

Reformasi Birokrasi, Pelayanan Publik, Kinerja, Good Governance, Transformasi Digital

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan membandingkan reformasi birokrasi serta kinerja pelayanan publik di Indonesia dan Singapura. Metode yang digunakan adalah pendekatan kualitatif dengan teknik studi literatur terhadap 15 sumber referensi ilmiah yang relevan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa reformasi birokrasi memiliki peran penting dalam meningkatkan kinerja pelayanan publik melalui penguatan manajemen kinerja, penerapan prinsip good governance, serta transformasi digital. Singapura menunjukkan keunggulan dalam hal efisiensi, transparansi, dan pemanfaatan teknologi dalam pelayanan publik, yang didukung oleh sistem digital governance yang terintegrasi. Sementara itu, Indonesia masih menghadapi berbagai tantangan, seperti keterbatasan sumber daya manusia, belum optimalnya integrasi teknologi, serta implementasi reformasi yang belum merata. Namun demikian, Indonesia menunjukkan perkembangan yang positif dalam upaya meningkatkan kualitas pelayanan publik. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa keberhasilan reformasi birokrasi sangat ditentukan oleh integrasi antara manajemen kinerja, good governance, dan transformasi digital.

References

Abane, J. A., & Brenya, E. (2021). The relationship between organizational environment antecedents and performance management in local government: Evidence from Ghana. Future Business Journal, 7(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/S43093-020-00049-2

Abbas, F., & Sadat, A. (2020). Model pelayanan publik terhadap reformasi birokrasi. Jurnal Studi Ilmu Pemerintahan, 1(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.35326/jsip.v1i1.525

Abdou, A. M. (2021). Good governance and COVID-19: The digital bureaucracy to response the pandemic (Singapore as a model). Journal of Public Affairs, 21(4), e2656. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2656

Adeniji, A. S. (2020). Performance measurement and good governance: An evaluation of Singaporean experience and lesson for Nigeria. Journal of Global Social Sciences, 1(4), 91–110.

Adrie, A. (2018). Konsep reformasi birokrasi pelayanan publik dalam perspektif hukum kepegawaian. Jurnal Aktual Justice, 3(1), 30–49. https://doi.org/10.47329/aktualjustice.v3i1.452

Cahlikova, T., & Mabillard, V. (2020). Open data and transparency: Opportunities and challenges in the Swiss context. Public Performance & Management Review, 43(3), 662–686. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2019.1657914

Engin, Z., Perdana, A., & Mokhtar, I. A. (2025). Digital transformation in government: Lessons from GovTech Singapore. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.08725

Haning, M. T. (2018). Reformasi birokrasi di Indonesia: Tinjauan dari perspektif administrasi publik. JAKPP (Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan & Pelayanan Publik), 4(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.31947/jakpp.v4i1.5902

Hayat. (2020). Paradigma good governance menuju shared governance melalui reformasi birokrasi dan inovasi pelayanan publik. ARISTO: Jurnal Sosial, Politik, Humaniora, 8(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.24269/ars.v8i1.2270

Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002

Mustofa, A., Haryati, E., & Ismail, S. (2025). The impact of digital transformation on public services governance: A quality assessment scale approach in urban municipalities. Journal of Governance & Regulation, 14(4), 156–165. https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv14i4art15

Perdana, A., & Mokhtar, I. A. (2025). Digital transformation in government: Lessons from GovTech Singapore. Journal of Information Technology Teaching Cases, 0(0), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/20438869251362871

Puspawati, A. A. (2016). Penerapan new public management (NPM) di Indonesia (Reformasi birokrasi, desentralisasi, kerjasama pemerintah dan swasta dalam meningkatkan pelayanan publik). Publisia: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.26905/pjiap.v1i1.426

Sukarno, D. H., Supriati, B. C., & Lopez, T. C. (2023). Transparency and policy implementation in the public sector in Singapore. Journal of Public Policy & Governance, 7(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t5223

Rizki, T., & Kurniawan, S. (2023). Public service performance: An influence of female leadership and good governance. Jurnal Bina Praja, 15(3), 443–452. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.15.2023.443-452

Sabani, A. (2021). Investigating the influence of transparency on the adoption of e-government in Indonesia. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 12(2), 236–255. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-03-2020-0046

Sardi, A., & Sorano, E. (2019). Dynamic performance management: An approach for managing the common goods. Sustainability, 11(22), 6435. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226435

Sofyani, H., Riyadh, H. A., & Fahlevi, H. (2020). Improving service quality, accountability and transparency of local government: The intervening role of information technology governance. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1735690. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1735690

Sukarno, M., Rodriguez, M. J., & Nursamsiyah. (2024). E-government development on control corruption: A lesson learned from Singapore. Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 11(3), 271–286. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.v11i3.21447

Taylor, J. (2021). Performance in the public sector. In J. M. Lewis & A. Tiernan (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Australian politics (pp. 82–95). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198805465.013.26

United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2022). United Nations E-Government Survey 2022: The future of digital government. United Nations. https://desapublications.un.org/sites/default/files/publications/2022-09/Web%20version%20E-Government%202022.pdf

Wibowo, A. A., & Kertati, I. (2022). Reformasi birokrasi dan pelayanan publik. Public Service and Governance Journal, 3(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.56444/psgj.v3i1.628

Wicaksono, K. W., & Ismail, H. H. (2013). Penerapan prinsip-prinsip administrasi dalam birokrasi Indonesia (Sebuah telaah kritis terhadap reformasi birokrasi di Indonesia berdasarkan perspektif prinsip-prinsip administrasi). Jurnal Bina Praja, 5(3), 163–168. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.05.2013.163-168

Yusriadi. (2018). Reformasi birokrasi Indonesia: Peluang dan hambatan. Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal), 8(2), 178–185. https://doi.org/10.31289/jap.v8i2.1824

Downloads

Published

2026-05-16

How to Cite

Erinaldi, Lubis, R., Marito, G., Larasati, N., & Kaharuddin, D. (2026). Perbandingan Reformasi Birokrasi dan Kinerja Pelayanan Publik di Indonesia dan Singapura. Jurnal Administrasi Pemerintahan Desa, 7(2), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.47134/villages.v7i2.466

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.