Collaborative Governance in Aceh's Mining Management: Towards Justice and Sustainability

Authors

  • Nurliana Iskandar Muda University
  • Teuku Muhammad Zulfikar Serambi Mekkah University
  • Rivai Ahmad Iskandar Muda University
  • Akhyar Akhyar Iskandar Muda University
  • Zamzami Iskandar Muda University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47134/villages.v7i1.360

Keywords:

Collaborative Governance, Mining Management, Justice and Sustainability

Abstract

The wealth of natural resources is often not directly proportional to the welfare of the community, triggering social and environmental conflicts and showing signs of the resource curse phenomenon due to weak governance. The prevalence of unlicensed mining activities has caused serious environmental damage, land degradation, and social conflict. This study aims to analyse how the Collaborative Governance framework can be implemented in Aceh to optimise the potential of the Qanun, while overcoming existing structural and institutional challenges. This study uses a descriptive qualitative research method, focusing on Collaborative Governance in Aceh's Mining Management. Data collection techniques include observation, interviews, and documentation, which are essential for gathering rich contextual information on the research topic. The results of research on mining governance in Aceh through the Qanun framework have provided a strong normative foundation, particularly in terms of distributive and procedural justice, the right to sue, and the role of the Wali Nanggroe Aceh. The implementation of collaborative governance is in its emerging phase and is not yet optimal. The main obstacles lie in the initial conditions, which are characterised by power asymmetry and resource disparities, inconsistent institutional design, and collaborative processes that fail to address crucial issues such as unlicensed mining. The failure of conventional governance requires a hybrid governance solution that legalises the informal sector on the condition of environmental and social compliance.

References

Ã, P. S., & Dietsche, E. (2008). Resource curse : An analysis of causes , experiences and possible ways forward. 36, 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.10.003

Argyrou, A. (2017). Making the Case for Case Studies in Empirical Legal Research. 13(3).

Buccola, V. S. J. (2015). Corporate Rights and Organizational Neutrality. 499–541.

Chukwuma-eke, E. C., Ogunsola, O. Y., & Isibor, N. J. (2021). Designing a Robust Cost Allocation Framework for Energy Corporations Using SAP for Improved Financial Performance. 809–822.

Economics, M., Nature, S., & Economics, M. (2022). Current trends in addressing environmental and social risks in mining and mineral supply chains by regulatory and voluntary approaches and mineral supply chains by regulatory and voluntary approaches.

Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2015). An Integrated Framework for Collaborative Governance An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance. October. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011

Gentles, S. J., Charles, C., Nicholas, D. B., Ploeg, J., & Mckibbon, K. A. (2016). Reviewing the research methods literature : principles and strategies illustrated by a systematic overview of sampling in qualitative research. Systematic Reviews, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0343-0

George, A. S. (2023). Partners Universal International Innovation Journal ( PUIIJ ) Evaluating India ’ s Economic Growth : Challenges and Opportunities on the Path to 5 Trillion Dollars Partners Universal International Innovation Journal ( PUIIJ ). December, 85–109. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10307006

Gollagher, M., & Hartz-karp, J. (2013). The Role of Deliberative Collaborative Governance in Achieving Sustainable Cities. 2343–2366. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5062343

Hayman, D. T. S., Barraclough, R. K., Muglia, L. J., Mcgovern, V., Afolabi, M. O., Jai, A. U. N., Ambe, J. R., Atim, C., Mcclelland, A., Paterson, B., Ijaz, K., Lasley, J., Ahsan, Q., & Garfield, R. (2023). Addressing the challenges of implementing evidence- ­ based prioritisation in global health. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012450

Hugon, G. A., Gössling, N. T., & Bryson, R. V. T. J. M. (2022). Multi ‑ stakeholder Engagement for the Sustainable Development Goals : Introduction to the Special Issue. Journal of Business Ethics, 180(4), 945–957. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05192-0

Koster, M. (2019). Assembling Formal and Informal Urban Governance : Political Brokerage in Recife , Brazil. June. https://doi.org/10.3138/anth.2018-0014

Latif, I. R., Hajad, V., & Handayani, S. W. (2024). Sustainable Forests , Divided Power : Navigating the Complexities of Customary Forest Resource of Management in Aceh Jaya Sustainable Forests , Divided Power : Navigating the Complexities of Customary Forest Resource of Management in Aceh Jaya. June. https://doi.org/10.24815/gaspol.v5i1.36219

Lestari, R., & Fuqara, F. A. (2025). Implementation of Qanun Aceh Number 15 of 2017 about Post- Mining Reclamation in West Aceh Regency. 1(1), 35–48.

Małyjurek, K. S. (2022). Interpretive structural modelling of inter ‑ agency collaboration risk in public safety networks. Quality & Quantity, 56(3), 1193–1221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01172-0

Mensah, A. K., Mahiri, I. O., Owusu, O., Mireku, O. D., Wireko, I., & Kissi, E. A. (2015). Environmental Impacts of Mining : A Study of Mining Communities in Ghana. 3(3), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.12691/aees-3-3-3

Movchan, R. O., Dudorov, O. O., Kamensky, D. V, Vozniuk, A. A., & Babanina, V. V. (2022). CRIMINAL LIABILITY FOR ILLEGAL MINING : ANALYSIS.

Muzari, T., Shava, G. N., & Shonhiwa, S. (2022). Qualitative Research Paradigm , a Key Research Design for Educational Researchers , Processes and Procedures : A Theoretical Overview. 2018, 14–20.

Newig, J., Challies, E., Jager, N. W., & Kochskaemper, E. (2018). The Environmental Performance of Participatory and Collaborative Governance : A Framework of Causal Mechanisms. 46(2), 269–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12209

Pactwa, K., & Wo, J. (2021). Sustainable Social and Environmental Evaluation of Post-Industrial Facilities in a Closed Loop Perspective in Coal-Mining Areas in Poland.

Print, I. O., Swastika, A. F., Wibawa, S., & Marvin, J. (2024). Enhancing Local Government Accountability through Good Governance Policies : A Mixed-Methods Study. 18(03), 122–131.

Rahim, S., Mohammed, M. O., Gombak, J., & Lumpur, K. (2018). OPERATIONALIZING DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE. 2(2), 415–442.

Sylvester, O., & Ade, O. S. (2018). Revenue Allocation in Nigeria : Implications for Sustainable National Development. 1, 31–41.

Temitope, T. (2023). Investigating Innovative Models of Governance and Collaboration for Effective Public Administration in a Multi- Stakeholder Landscape. 4(2), 18–28.

Wibowo, A. (2023). Enhancing Economic Growth for the Achievement of Sustainable Development Goals through Digital Era Fundraising Schemes for Sustainable Community development : A Policy Analysis from the Islamic Economic Perspective. 26–37.

Wijatmoko, E., Armawi, A., & Faisal, T. (2023). Heliyon Legal effectiveness in promoting development policies : A case study of North Aceh Indonesia. Heliyon, 9(11), e21280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21280

Woldesenbet, W. G. (2020). Analyzing multi ‑ stakeholder collaborative governance practices in urban water projects in Addis Ababa City : procedures , priorities , and structures. Applied Water Science, 10(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-019-1137-z

Downloads

Published

2025-11-19

How to Cite

Nurliana, N., Zulfikar, T. M., Ahmad, R., Akhyar, A., & Zamzami, Z. (2025). Collaborative Governance in Aceh’s Mining Management: Towards Justice and Sustainability. Jurnal Administrasi Pemerintahan Desa, 7(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.47134/villages.v7i1.360

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.