Korupsi Dana Desa Dalam Perspektif Principal-Agent
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47134/villages.v4i2.52Keywords:
Keywords, Elite Capture, Principal-Agent, Information asymmetryAbstract
Studi ini berjudul “Korupsi Dana Desa Dalam Perspektif Principal-Agent”. Dilatari oleh munculnya fenomena local elit capture yang semakin menciderai kepercayaan publik terhadap penyelenggaran pemerintah pada aras lokal Desa. Menggunakan pendekatan principal-agent sebagai pisau teoretik dalam memaknai korupsi pada aras lokal Desa. Menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif untuk meneropong fenomena sosial yang diteliti dalam membaca dan menganalisis setiap data yang ditemukan. Penelitian ini menghasilkan temuan. Pertama, korupsi sebagai akibat asimetri informasi diantara principal dan agent. Kekuasaan atas informasi dimanfaatkan oleh elit lokal untuk mengkapitalisasi proses pembangunan. Kedua, korupsi terjadi karena ketiadaan mekanisme pengawasan publik pada aras lokal.
References
Ackerman, R. S., & Palifka, J. B. (2016). Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform. Cambridge University Press.
Amundsen, I. (1999). Political Corruption: An Introduction to the Issues. In 7 (Working Paper 7).
Andvig, J. C., Fjeldstad, O. H., Amundsen, I., Sissener, T., & Søreide, T. (2001). Corruption: A review of contemporary research. In Report - Chr. MichelsenJurnal Administrasi Pemerintahan Desa Vol 04 No 02 Agustus 2023 (121-135) https://villages.pubmedia.id/index.php/villages/index Prefix 10.47134 132 Institute (Issue 7).
Arl. (2022). Korupsi Dana Desa, Mantan Sekdes Sesait Divonis 5 Tahun 6 Bulan Penjara. Lombokpost.Jawapost.Com. https://lombokpost.jawapos.com/hukrim/07/01/202 2/korupsi-dana-desa-mantan-sekdes-sesait-divonis- 5-tahun-6-bulan-penjara/
Atkinson, J. D. (2017). Chapter Title : Qualitative Methods Book Title : Journey into Social Activism Book Subtitle : Qualitative Approaches This chapter explores : Journey into Social Activism, 27–64. https://www-jstororg.ezproxy.napier.ac.uk/stable/pdf/j.ctt1hfr0rk.5.p df?refreqid=excelsior%3A5c610e25e7f3d31e1e6b914 5da896748
Carr B, J., & Ralph, B. S. (2000). Principled Opportunism: Evidence From the Organizational Middle. Public Administration Quarterly, 24(1), 109–138.
Dihni, V. A. (2022). ICW: Kasus Korupsi Terbanyak Terjadi di Sektor Anggaran Dana Desa pada 2021. Katadata.Co.Id.
Forgues-Puccio, & F, G. (2013). Existing practices on anticorruption. Oxpord Policy Management Groenendijk, N. (1997). A principal-agent model of corruption. Crime, Law and Social Change, 27(3–4), 207–229. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008267601329
Halim, A., & Abdullah, S. (2006). Hubungan dan Masalah Keagenan di Pemerintah Daerah: Sebuah Peluang Penelitian Anggaran dan AKuntansi. Jurnal Akuntansi Pemerintahan, 2(1), 53–64.
Jain, A. K. (2001). CORRUPTION : A REVIEW. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15(1).
Klitgaard, R. (2011). Figthing Corruption. CESifo DICEJurnal Administrasi Pemerintahan Desa Vol 04 No 02 Agustus 2023 (121-135) https://villages.pubmedia.id/index.php/villages/index Prefix 10.47134 133 Report, 31–35.
Lane Erick, J. (2000). The Public Sector: Concepts, Models and Approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publication.
Lupia, A. (2001). Delegation of Power: Agency Theory. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition (Second Edi, Vol. 5). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.93029-0
Marquette, H., & Peiffer, C. (2015). Corruption and Collective Action. Development Leadership Program, U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre, 22. http://www.dlprog.org/research/corruption-andcollectiveaction.php%5Cnhttp://www.u4.no/publications/cor ruption-and-collective-action/
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2014). Analisis data kualitatif: buku sumber tentang metode-metode baru. UI PRESS.
Mungiu-Pippidi, A., & Hartmann, T. (2019). Corruption and Development: A Reappraisal. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Economics and Finance (Issue July). https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190625979.013. 237
Persson, A., Rothstein, B., & Teorell, J. (2012). Why anticorruption reforms fail-systemic corruption as a collective action problem. Governance, 26(3), 449– 471. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01604.x
Priyono, B. H. (2018). Korupsi, Melacak Arti, Menyimak Implikasi. Gramedia Pustaka. PUTUSAN Nomor 11/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/PN Mtr. (2021).
Riharjo, I. B., & Isnadi, I. (2010). PERILAKU OPORTUNISTIK PEJABAT EKSEKUTIF DALAM PENYUSUNAN APBD (Bukti Empiris atas Penggunaan Penerimaan Sumber Daya Alam).Jurnal Administrasi Pemerintahan Desa Vol 04 No 02 Agustus 2023 (121-135) https://villages.pubmedia.id/index.php/villages/index Prefix 10.47134 134 EKUITAS (Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan), 14(3), 389. https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2010.v14.i3.2180
Sommer, J. M. (2017). Grand and petty corruption: a crossnational analysis of forest loss in low- and middleincome nations. Environmental Sociology, 3(4), 414– 426. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2017.1348569
Stephenson, M. (2015). Corruption is BOTH a “PrincipalAgent Problem” And a “Collective Action Problem.” Https://Globalanticorruptionblog.Com/.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2013). Dasar-dasar Penelitian Kualitatif [Tatalangkah dan Teknik-teknik Teoritisasi Data]. Pustaka Pelajar.
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&B. Alfabeta. Sutarna, I. T. (2022). Korupsi berkelanjutan (perpetual corruption) pada era desentralisasi. Disertasi Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Ugur, M., & Dasgupta, N. (2011). Evidence on the economic growth impacts of corruption in low-income countries and beyond: a systematic review. In Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London (Issue 1914).
Walton, G., & Jones, A. (2017). The Geographies of Collective Action, Principal-Agent Theory and Potential Corruption in Papua New Guinea. SSRN Electronic Journal, June. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2993709
Widmalm, S. (2008). Decentralisation, Corruption and Capital. From India To The West. Sage Publications.
Yin K, R. (2015). Studi Kasus Desain dan Metode. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Perkasa.Jurnal Administrasi Pemerintahan Desa Vol 04 No 02 Agustus 2023 (121-135) https://villages.pubmedia.id/index.php/villages/index Prefix 10.47134 135
Lucas, A. (2016). Elite Capture and Corruption in two Villages in Bengkulu Province, Sumatra. Human Ecology, 44(3), 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-016-9837-6
Mattingly, D. C. (2016a). Elite capture: How decentralization and informal institutions weaken property rights in China. World Politics, 68(3), 383–412. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887116000083
Mattingly, D. C. (2016b). Elite capture: How decentralization and informal institutions weaken property rights in China. World Politics, 68(3), 383–412. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887116000083
Panda, S. (2015). Political Connections and Elite Capture in a Poverty Alleviation Programme in India. Journal of Development Studies, 51(1), 50–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2014.947281
Persha, L., & Andersson, K. (2014). Elite capture risk and mitigation in decentralized forest governance regimes. Global Environmental Change, 24(1), 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.005
Rigon, A. (2014). Building local governance: Participation and elite capture in slum-upgrading in Kenya. Development and Change, 45(2), 257–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12078
Ruan, J., & Wang, P. (2023). Elite Capture and Corruption: The Influence of Elite Collusion on Village Elections and Rural Land Development in China. China Quarterly, 253, 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741022001217
Waheduzzaman, W., As-Saber, S., & Hamid, M. B. (2018). Elite capture of local participatory governance. Policy and Politics, 46(4), 645–662. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557318X15296526896 531
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This journal is based on the work at https://villages.pubmedia.id/index.php/villages under license from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. You are free to:
- Share – copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
- Adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms, which include the following:
- Attribution. You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike. If you remix, transform or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions. You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Information for authors
The author should be aware that by submitting an article to this journal, the article's copyright will be fully transferred to Jurnal Administrasi Pemerintahan Desa. Authors are allowed to resend their manuscript to other journals or intentionally withdraw the manuscript only if both parties (Jurnal Administrasi Pemerintahan Desa and Authors) have agreed on the issue. Once the manuscript has been published, authors are allowed to use their published article under Jurnal Administrasi Pemerintahan Desa copyrights.
All authors are required to deliver the agreement of license transfer once they submit the manuscript to Jurnal Administrasi Pemerintahan Desa. By signing the agreement, the copyright is attributed to this journal to protect the intellectual material for the authors. Authors are allowed to share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium and in any circumstances.
• Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)
Jurnal Administrasi Pemerintahan Desa is licensed under an International License
