Korupsi Dana Desa Dalam Perspektif Principal-Agent
Abstract
Studi ini berjudul “Korupsi Dana Desa Dalam Perspektif Principal-Agent”. Dilatari oleh munculnya fenomena local elit capture yang semakin menciderai kepercayaan publik terhadap penyelenggaran pemerintah pada aras lokal Desa. Menggunakan pendekatan principal-agent sebagai pisau teoretik dalam memaknai korupsi pada aras lokal Desa. Menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif untuk meneropong fenomena sosial yang diteliti dalam membaca dan menganalisis setiap data yang ditemukan. Penelitian ini menghasilkan temuan. Pertama, korupsi sebagai akibat asimetri informasi diantara principal dan agent. Kekuasaan atas informasi dimanfaatkan oleh elit lokal untuk mengkapitalisasi proses pembangunan. Kedua, korupsi terjadi karena ketiadaan mekanisme pengawasan publik pada aras lokal.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ackerman, R. S., & Palifka, J. B. (2016). Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform. Cambridge University Press.
Amundsen, I. (1999). Political Corruption: An Introduction to the Issues. In 7 (Working Paper 7).
Andvig, J. C., Fjeldstad, O. H., Amundsen, I., Sissener, T., & Søreide, T. (2001). Corruption: A review of contemporary research. In Report - Chr. MichelsenJurnal Administrasi Pemerintahan Desa Vol 04 No 02 Agustus 2023 (121-135) https://villages.pubmedia.id/index.php/villages/index Prefix 10.47134 132 Institute (Issue 7).
Arl. (2022). Korupsi Dana Desa, Mantan Sekdes Sesait Divonis 5 Tahun 6 Bulan Penjara. Lombokpost.Jawapost.Com. https://lombokpost.jawapos.com/hukrim/07/01/202 2/korupsi-dana-desa-mantan-sekdes-sesait-divonis- 5-tahun-6-bulan-penjara/
Atkinson, J. D. (2017). Chapter Title : Qualitative Methods Book Title : Journey into Social Activism Book Subtitle : Qualitative Approaches This chapter explores : Journey into Social Activism, 27–64. https://www-jstororg.ezproxy.napier.ac.uk/stable/pdf/j.ctt1hfr0rk.5.p df?refreqid=excelsior%3A5c610e25e7f3d31e1e6b914 5da896748
Carr B, J., & Ralph, B. S. (2000). Principled Opportunism: Evidence From the Organizational Middle. Public Administration Quarterly, 24(1), 109–138.
Dihni, V. A. (2022). ICW: Kasus Korupsi Terbanyak Terjadi di Sektor Anggaran Dana Desa pada 2021. Katadata.Co.Id.
Forgues-Puccio, & F, G. (2013). Existing practices on anticorruption. Oxpord Policy Management Groenendijk, N. (1997). A principal-agent model of corruption. Crime, Law and Social Change, 27(3–4), 207–229. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008267601329
Halim, A., & Abdullah, S. (2006). Hubungan dan Masalah Keagenan di Pemerintah Daerah: Sebuah Peluang Penelitian Anggaran dan AKuntansi. Jurnal Akuntansi Pemerintahan, 2(1), 53–64.
Jain, A. K. (2001). CORRUPTION : A REVIEW. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15(1).
Klitgaard, R. (2011). Figthing Corruption. CESifo DICEJurnal Administrasi Pemerintahan Desa Vol 04 No 02 Agustus 2023 (121-135) https://villages.pubmedia.id/index.php/villages/index Prefix 10.47134 133 Report, 31–35.
Lane Erick, J. (2000). The Public Sector: Concepts, Models and Approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publication.
Lupia, A. (2001). Delegation of Power: Agency Theory. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition (Second Edi, Vol. 5). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.93029-0
Marquette, H., & Peiffer, C. (2015). Corruption and Collective Action. Development Leadership Program, U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre, 22. http://www.dlprog.org/research/corruption-andcollectiveaction.php%5Cnhttp://www.u4.no/publications/cor ruption-and-collective-action/
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2014). Analisis data kualitatif: buku sumber tentang metode-metode baru. UI PRESS.
Mungiu-Pippidi, A., & Hartmann, T. (2019). Corruption and Development: A Reappraisal. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Economics and Finance (Issue July). https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190625979.013. 237
Persson, A., Rothstein, B., & Teorell, J. (2012). Why anticorruption reforms fail-systemic corruption as a collective action problem. Governance, 26(3), 449– 471. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01604.x
Priyono, B. H. (2018). Korupsi, Melacak Arti, Menyimak Implikasi. Gramedia Pustaka. PUTUSAN Nomor 11/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/PN Mtr. (2021).
Riharjo, I. B., & Isnadi, I. (2010). PERILAKU OPORTUNISTIK PEJABAT EKSEKUTIF DALAM PENYUSUNAN APBD (Bukti Empiris atas Penggunaan Penerimaan Sumber Daya Alam).Jurnal Administrasi Pemerintahan Desa Vol 04 No 02 Agustus 2023 (121-135) https://villages.pubmedia.id/index.php/villages/index Prefix 10.47134 134 EKUITAS (Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan), 14(3), 389. https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2010.v14.i3.2180
Sommer, J. M. (2017). Grand and petty corruption: a crossnational analysis of forest loss in low- and middleincome nations. Environmental Sociology, 3(4), 414– 426. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2017.1348569
Stephenson, M. (2015). Corruption is BOTH a “PrincipalAgent Problem” And a “Collective Action Problem.” Https://Globalanticorruptionblog.Com/.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2013). Dasar-dasar Penelitian Kualitatif [Tatalangkah dan Teknik-teknik Teoritisasi Data]. Pustaka Pelajar.
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&B. Alfabeta. Sutarna, I. T. (2022). Korupsi berkelanjutan (perpetual corruption) pada era desentralisasi. Disertasi Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Ugur, M., & Dasgupta, N. (2011). Evidence on the economic growth impacts of corruption in low-income countries and beyond: a systematic review. In Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London (Issue 1914).
Walton, G., & Jones, A. (2017). The Geographies of Collective Action, Principal-Agent Theory and Potential Corruption in Papua New Guinea. SSRN Electronic Journal, June. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2993709
Widmalm, S. (2008). Decentralisation, Corruption and Capital. From India To The West. Sage Publications.
Yin K, R. (2015). Studi Kasus Desain dan Metode. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Perkasa.Jurnal Administrasi Pemerintahan Desa Vol 04 No 02 Agustus 2023 (121-135) https://villages.pubmedia.id/index.php/villages/index Prefix 10.47134 135
Lucas, A. (2016). Elite Capture and Corruption in two Villages in Bengkulu Province, Sumatra. Human Ecology, 44(3), 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-016-9837-6
Mattingly, D. C. (2016a). Elite capture: How decentralization and informal institutions weaken property rights in China. World Politics, 68(3), 383–412. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887116000083
Mattingly, D. C. (2016b). Elite capture: How decentralization and informal institutions weaken property rights in China. World Politics, 68(3), 383–412. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887116000083
Panda, S. (2015). Political Connections and Elite Capture in a Poverty Alleviation Programme in India. Journal of Development Studies, 51(1), 50–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2014.947281
Persha, L., & Andersson, K. (2014). Elite capture risk and mitigation in decentralized forest governance regimes. Global Environmental Change, 24(1), 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.005
Rigon, A. (2014). Building local governance: Participation and elite capture in slum-upgrading in Kenya. Development and Change, 45(2), 257–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12078
Ruan, J., & Wang, P. (2023). Elite Capture and Corruption: The Influence of Elite Collusion on Village Elections and Rural Land Development in China. China Quarterly, 253, 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741022001217
Waheduzzaman, W., As-Saber, S., & Hamid, M. B. (2018). Elite capture of local participatory governance. Policy and Politics, 46(4), 645–662. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557318X15296526896 531
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47134/villages.v4i2.52
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Administrasi Pemerintahan Desa
Editorial Office:
Perumahan Sidorejo, Gg. Sadewa No.D3, Sonopakis Kidul, Ngestiharjo, Kapanewon. Kasihan, Kabupaten Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta 55184
 |  |  |
 |  |  |
 |